Skip to content

The Immigration Bulletin

Your resource for all things immigration.

  • Home
  • About
  • Authors
    • Maria del Carmen Ramos
    • Mechelle Zarou
  • Immigration
  • Links
  • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
The Immigration Bulletin

If You Renounce Your U.S. Citizenship, You Have to Pay the Piper

Maria del Carmen Ramos
Maria del Carmen Ramos

The increased popularity of renouncing your U.S. citizenship to avoid potential tax liabilities has resulted in a surprising fee hike by the U.S. Department of State. Although the hike is not unexpected, the fee increase of fivefold is. Sought to be a deterrent to discourage dual citizens from renouncing their U.S. citizenship, the fee increased from $450 to $2,350 on September 4, 2014.

By way of background, in 2012, about 932 people renounced their U.S. citizenship. That number more than tripled in 2013 with approximately 3,000 expatriations. And that number is expected to be exceeded by the end of 2014. One reason for the increase in expatriation cases is the vigorous enforcement by the IRS of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA). FACTA, enacted to prevent U.S. taxpayers from being able to conceal assets held in offshore accounts and shell corporations, is a federal law that requires U.S. citizens, including individuals who live outside the U.S., to report their financial accounts held outside the U.S. The law imposes a reporting obligation to the IRS on foreign financial institutions regarding withholding account identification, and documentation relevant to their clients and customers.

To begin with, under section 349 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), a person can lose their citizenship by formally renouncing his or her nationality before a diplomatic or consular officer of the United States in a foreign state. The process for a person to renounce his or her citizenship is set forth in the Foreign Affairs Manual.

As explained in that manual, a person seeking to renounce his or citizenship must (i) appear at a diplomatic or consular office; and (ii) read, understand, and sign a Statement of Understanding Concerning the Consequences and Ramifications of Relinquishment or Renunciation of U.S. Citizenship (Form DS-4081) and Oath/Affirmation of Renunciation of Nationality of United States (Form DS-4080). Once a person completes those acts, the consular officer will issue a Certificate of Loss of Nationality. That certificate, along with the oath of renunciation, will be forwarded to the State Department for approval. The State Department must then approve the consular officer’s issuance of the Certification of Loss of Nationality before the renunciation is effective.

Non-minor children can also renounce their American citizenship following this process. But it may be more difficult for the minor child to do so. That is because the central issue in determining whether a person has renounced his or her citizenship is whether the person understood the implications of renunciation, and as a consequence, the State Department generally does not permit minors (persons under the age of 18) to renounce their citizenship or their parents to renounce citizenship on their behalf. Before the State Department will issue the oath of renunciation to a minor, the minor must convince the diplomatic or consular officer that the minor (i) fully understands the nature and consequences of the oath of renunciation; (ii) is not subject to duress or undue influence; and (iii) is voluntarily seeking to renounce his or her citizenship. If the minor child is able to convince the diplomatic or consular officer of those things, then he or she will be able to renounce his or her citizenship.

While voluntary expatriation—renunciation of citizenship—may have tax advantages, it has significant negative consequences as well. A person who renounces his or her citizenship may not be able to travel to the United States. Under section 212(a)(E)(10) of the INA (known as the Reed Amendment), any former citizen who renounced his or her citizenship to avoid taxes may not be admitted into the United States.

The Internal Revenue Code provides that a former citizen has renounced his or her citizenship for tax avoidance purposes if the former citizen’s tax liability or net worth exceeded certain amounts on the date of expatriation, unless the former citizen qualifies for one of two exceptions. The first exception is for dual citizens. A person does not fall under the purview of the Reed Amendment if the person (i) became a United States citizen and a citizen of another country at birth and remains a citizen of the other country; and (ii) does not have substantial contacts with the United States. A person does not have substantial contacts if the person (i) was never a resident of the United States; (ii) never held a United States passport; and (iii) was not present in the United States for more than 30 days during any of the 10 years preceding the person’s expatriation. The second exception is for minor children. Minor children do not fall within the purview of the Reed Amendment if (i) the child became a citizen of the United States at birth; (ii) neither of the child’s parents was a United States citizen at the time of the child’s birth; (iii) the child was expatriated before the child reached 18½ years of age; and (iv) the child was not present in the United States for more than 30 days during any of the 10 years preceding the person’s expatriation.

As a practical matter, an individual’s renunciation of their American citizenship will most likely not prevent them from visiting the United States for limited periods of time. But clients should be aware that section 212(a) of the INA does, on its face, bar admission of former citizens who renounced their citizenship for tax avoidance purposes, and there is no guarantee that the Department of Homeland Security will decline to enforce or grant the individuals a waiver from the Reed Amendment. Finally, because renunciation is the most unequivocal way in which a person can manifest an intention to relinquish U.S. citizenship, those contemplating a renunciation should understand that the act is irrevocable, except as provided in 8.U.S.C. §1483, and cannot be canceled or set aside absent successful administrative judicial appeal.

For this reason, clients should seek the advice of competent immigration and tax counsel before considering navigating this process.

Share this:
Author Maria del Carmen RamosPosted on September 18, 2014Categories Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), Internal Revenue Service, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS)Tags Act, Amendment, Citizenship, FATCA, Nationality

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Extension of Temporary Protected Status for Sudan
Next Next post: Federal Government Fines Its Own Janitorial Service for I-9 Violations

Archives

  • February 2024
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • May 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • August 2012

Categories

  • American Competitiveness in the Twenty-first Century Act of 2000 (AC 21)
  • Anchor Baby
  • Application for Regional Center Under the Immigrant Investor Pilot Program
  • Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART)
  • Athletes
  • B
  • B-1
  • B-1/B-2
  • B-2
  • Birth Tourism
  • China
  • COVID-19
  • Cuba
  • Cuban Assets Control Regulations
  • Cuban Family Reunification Parole (CFRP) Program
  • Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
  • Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)
  • Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Program
  • Deferred Action for Parents (DAPA)
  • Deferred Action to Parents of U.S. Citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA)
  • Diversity Visa Lottery Program
  • Document Abuse
  • Document Discrimination
  • DS-160
  • E
  • E-2
  • E-3
  • E-Verify
  • EB-1
  • EB-2
  • EB-3
  • EB-4
  • EB-5
  • Employment Authorization
  • Employment-Based Preferences
  • Execution Actions on Immigration
  • F-1
  • Family-Based Preferences
  • Federal Register
  • Final Rules
  • Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act
  • Foreign Policy
  • Form I-129, Petition for Non-immigrant Worker
  • Form I-20
  • Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status
  • Form I-526
  • Form I-526, Immigrant Petition by Alien Entrepreneur
  • Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization
  • Form I-821, Application for Temporary Protected Status
  • Form I-829
  • Form I-829, Petition by Entrepreneur to Remove Conditions
  • Form I-9
  • Form I-9 Penalties
  • Form I-912, Request for Fee Waiver
  • Form I-924
  • Form I-924, Application for Regional Center Under the Immigrant Investor Pilot Program
  • Form I-924A
  • Form I-924A, Supplement to Form I-924
  • Fourteenth Amendment
  • H-1B
  • H-2A
  • H-2B
  • H-4
  • H-4 Employment Authorization
  • Handbook for Employers
  • High-skilled Workers & Entrepreneurs
  • Hillsborough County Bar Association
  • Honduras
  • Human Trafficking
  • I-94
  • Immigrant Investor Program Office
  • Immigrant Petition by Alien Entrepreneur
  • Immigrant Visas
  • Immigration Accountability Executive Actions
  • Immigration and Nationality Act (INA)
  • Immigration Reform
  • Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA)
  • India
  • Internal Revenue Service
  • International Entrepreneur Rule
  • J-1
  • L
  • L-1A
  • L-1B
  • Labor Certification
  • Labor Condition Application
  • Lottery
  • M-274
  • M-274, Handbook for Employers
  • Major League Baseball (MLB)
  • National Visa Center
  • Naturalization Process
  • New Priority Enforcement Program
  • News and Events
  • Nicaragua
  • Non-Immigrant Visas
  • Notice of Inspection (NOI)
  • Notice of Intent to Fine
  • O
  • Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer (OCAHO)
  • Optional Practical Training (OPT)
  • Over-Documentation
  • P
  • P-1
  • Parole Rules
  • PERM
  • Permanent Residency
  • Petition by Entrepreneur to Remove Conditions
  • Prevailing Wage
  • Processing Times
  • Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States
  • Provisional Unlawful Presence Waiver
  • Reciprocity Table
  • Regional Center Pilot Program
  • Removal Priorities
  • Retrogression
  • Revised Forms
  • Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM)
  • Sports & Entertainment
  • Supplement to Form I-924
  • T-6
  • Technical Assistance Letter
  • Technical Assistance Letter (TAL)
  • Temporary Protected Status (TPS)
  • Temporary Worker Visas
  • Texas
  • Trading with the Enemy Act
  • Travel
  • U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS)
  • U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
  • U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)
  • U.S. Department of Labor (DOL)
  • U.S. Department of State (DOS)
  • U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
  • Unaccompanied Minors
  • Uncategorized
  • Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013 (VAWA 2013)
  • Visa Bulletin
  • Visa Fees
  • Visa Waiver Program
  • Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Attorney Spotlight

Maria del Carmen Ramos, Partner, Handles all types of immigration matters for foreign nationals and large institutional clients, including routinely filing petitions for non-immigrant visas on behalf of employers, and advising and training employers on I-9 compliance.

Archives

  • February 2024
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • May 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • August 2012
  • Home
  • About
  • Authors
    • Maria del Carmen Ramos
    • Mechelle Zarou
  • Immigration
  • Links
  • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
The Immigration Bulletin Proudly powered by WordPress